• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    The present invention relates to the validation of decontamination processes, and in particular new control organisms, as well as mixtures of these microorganisms, used to validate the decontamination processes.
    公开号:FR3050738A1
    申请号:FR1653914
    申请日:2016-04-29
    公开日:2017-11-03
    发明作者:Martin Pablo Alvarez；Karim-Franck Khinouche
    申请人:Novolyze；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    MICROORGANISMS WITNESSES OF DECONTAMINATION
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
    The present invention relates to the validation of decontamination processes, and in particular new control organisms, as well as mixtures of these microorganisms, used to validate the decontamination processes.
    STATE OF THE ART
    Pasteurization processes are applied in many areas, from material sterilization to decontamination of food, especially dry foods. These processes consist of specific steps of decontamination / sterilization, or are the concomitant result of a step of a treatment process, such as for example a cooking step of a food, for example the roasting of products of origin vegetable.
    Plant-based products, such as almonds or spices, are often contaminated by pathogenic microorganisms present in their culture, storage and use environment that requires a decontamination step prior to their use for human consumption. Often, this decontamination is done as a temperature treatment of these foods, such as baking, roasting or drying. However, some pathogens may be resistant to certain decontamination conditions and it must be ensured, before the implementation of the process, that the decontamination objective will be achieved.
    This validation can not be done with a pathogenic microorganism because of the risk of contamination. To do this, we use so-called "surrogate" control microorganisms, the behavior of which in view of the treatment conditions must be close to that of the pathogenic organism. Preferably, the substitutes will be chosen to be more resistant to the treatment conditions than the pathogens, without having a behavior too far from that of these target pathogens.
    These substitutes are generally specific for a particular pathogen in a decontamination process, such as, for example, Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 8459) recommended for the validation of pasteurization processes for almonds that may be contaminated by pathogenic salmonellae.
    The substitutes are not necessarily the microorganisms more closely related to target pathogens, for example the genus Citrobacterium, a rock genus of a Salmonella evolutionary pathway, is not described as a substitute for this pathogen. Thus, as a Salmonella substitute, some employed Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC 12980) for the validation of a feed extrusion process (Okelo et al., 2006 and 2008), Enterococcus faecium (NRRL B-2354). for pasteurization of liquids (Annous, 1998), almonds (ABC, 2007) or extrusion of foods (Bianchit, 2014), Pantoea agglomerates (SPS 2F-1) for roasting almonds (ABC, 2007), Pediococcus spp. and Pediococcus acidilactici for the preparation of dried beef strips (Berewski, 2009), the dried turkey preparation (Williams, 2010) or the extrusion of animal feed (Ceylan and Bautista, 2015), and Staphylococcus carnosus (CS- 299) for the preparation of ground beef and sausage meat (Vasan et al., 2014).
    As substitutes for Clostridium botulinium, some have used Bacillus amyoliquefaciens for the preparation of carrot puree (Marogosch et al., 2004) or Clostridium sporogenes (PA3679, 3676 and 3678) for low acid foods (Larson and Johnson, 2003; al., 2015).
    As Listeria monocytogenes substitutes, some have used Listeria innocua in a sausage pasteurization process (Sommers et al., 2008) or Escherichia coli K12 in a radiation sterilization process for melons (Rodrigues et al., 2006).
    Various non-pathogenic E. coli have been described as substitutes for E. coli 0157: H7 in the treatment of juices (Gurtier, 2010) or beef (Garcia Hernandez et al., 2015).
    While the strain Enterococcus faecium (NRRL B-2354) has been used for thermal process validation for several low water-activity foods, this strain has a much higher heat resistance than many pathogens, including Salmonella.
    There remains a need for substitutes better adapted to decontamination processes and target pathogens, which can be used alone or in mixtures, which have resistance behaviors closer to the target pathogen (s) and provide more relevant information regarding the decontamination process of in order to validate processes that are more energy efficient and more respectful of the structural and / or organoleptic properties of the products treated.
    The inventors have identified several groups of non-pathogenic microorganisms meeting this need.
    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
    The present invention relates to a method for controlling a decontamination process in which the decontamination process is carried out in the presence of at least one control microorganism, or a mixture of control microorganisms, and the behavior of the microorganism (s) is observed. control during said decontamination process, characterized in that the control microorganism is a non-pathogenic microorganism selected from non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Enterobacter, of the genus Erwinia or of the genus Pantoea.
    The present invention also relates to control microorganisms that can be used as substitutes in a control method of a decontamination process, chosen from Enterobacter hormaechei CNCM 1-5058, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM 1-5059, Enterobacter mori CNCM 1-5060, Pantoea calida CNCM I-5061, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5062, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5063, Pantoea aggiomerans CNCM I-5054, Pantoea aggiomerans CNCM I-5055, Pantoea caiida CNCM I-5056, Pantoea gaviniae CNCM I-5057.
    It also relates to a control kit of a decontamination process, comprising at least one control microorganism according to the invention and a suitable support for its use in the decontamination process.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
    The present invention relates to a method of controlling a decontamination process in which the decontamination process is carried out in the presence of at least one control microorganism, or a mixture of control microorganisms, and the behavior of said one or more a control microorganism during said decontamination process, characterized in that the control microorganism is a non-pathogenic microorganism selected from non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Enterobacter, of the genus Erwinia or of the genus Pantoea.
    By "microorganism" is meant a set of several individuals of microorganisms of the same species.
    In particular, the bacteria selected from the species Enterobacter hormeaechei, Enterobacter mori, Erwinia persicina, Pantoea aggiomerans, Pantoea calida, and Pantoea gaviniae, more particularly chosen from the following species, deposited at the CNCM according to the Budapest Treaty: Enterobacter hormaechei CNCM I -5058, Pantoea aggiomerans CNCM I-5059, Enterobacter mori CNCM I-5060, Pantoea calida CNCM I-5061, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5062, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5063, Pantoea aggiomerans CNCM I-5054, Pantoea aggiomerans CNCM 1- 5055, Pantoea calida CNCM 1-5056, Pantoea gaviniae CNCM 1-5057.
    According to a first embodiment of the invention, at least one control microorganism is chosen from non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Enterobacter oo of the Erwinia genus and their mixtures.
    Advantageously, a mixture of at least 2 control microorganisms (multiplexed validation) is used, in particular at least 2 control microorganisms chosen from non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Enterobacter or of the genus Erwinia and their mixtures. According to a more particular embodiment of the invention, the mixture comprises at least one control microorganism chosen from non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Enterobacter or genus Erwinia and at least one control microorganism chosen from non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Pantoea.
    Among the non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Enterobacter, of the genus Erwinia or of the genus Pantoea, mention will in particular be made of the bacteria selected from the species Enterobacter hormeaechei, Enterobacter mori, Erwinia persicina, Pantoea aggiomerans, Pantoea caiida, and Pantoea gaviniae, more particularly chosen from following species deposited at the CNCM according to the Budapest Treaty: Enterobacter hormaechei CNCM 1-5058, Pantoea aggiomerans CNCM 1-5059, Enterobacter mori CNCM 1-5060, Pantoea caiida CNCM 1-5061, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5062, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5063, Pantoea aggiomemns CNCM I-5054, Pantoea aggiomerans CNCM I-5055, Pantoea caiida CNCM I-5056, Pantoea gaviniae CNCM I-5057.
    These non-pathogenic control microorganisms have the advantage of showing a resistance to the conditions of implementation of different decontamination processes greater than that of at least one target pathogenic organism. These target pathogenic organisms are microorganisms responsible for contamination, in particular the pathogenic bacteria of the genera Salmonella, Escherichia, Bacillus, Listeria, Campylobacter, Cronobacter, etc. The purpose of the decontamination process being controlled is to eliminate all of these pathogens in the event that they are present in the product being treated.
    Advantageously, the control microorganisms have a higher heat resistance to Salmonella under low aw conditions and packaged on an inert matrix.
    By "low aw" is preferably meant water activity less than 0.85 (CAC / RCP 75-2015, Codex Alimentarius).
    By "inert matrix" is preferably meant a suitable carrier for the storage and use of control microorganisms, particularly in dry form. The carrier is inert, ie does not interact with the metabolism of bacteria in dry form for optimal conservation over time.
    In the decontamination process, the control microorganism will be employed in a suitable form, corresponding to the form of the targeted pathogen likely to be present in the product to be decontaminated, in particular in the form of spores, vegetative form and / or dry vegetative form.
    By "dry form" is meant under vegetative bacteria which have followed a drying process allowing their conservation for a fixed period without modifying its resistance characteristics.
    The decontamination processes generally include one or more steps of pasteurization, drying, extrusion, roasting, cooking, sterilization, autoclaving and steaming.
    These processes are well known to those skilled in the art, including pasteurization, drying, extrusion, roasting, baking, sterilization, autoclaving, steaming, pulsed light, high pressure treatments, or irradiation, sterilization by gas (Etc. , pp, ozone) and disinfectants (bleach, peracetic acid ...), especially for the treatment of natural or manufactured products, such as nuts, herbs, seeds, spices, food powders, food for pets and livestock, cereals, etc.
    The substitutes, and mixtures of substitutes, according to the invention may be used, depending on the selected foods and processes, to validate the decontaminations of pathogens such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Bacillus, Listeria, Campylobacter, Cronobacter sakazakii, etc. For this purpose, the control microorganism will be used with a suitable carrier, well known to those skilled in the art, preferably inert, for example with cryoprotectants such as maltodextrin and / or milk powder and solid supports such as talc, silica and / or activated carbon. The support may also include a marker which makes it possible to easily find the contaminated products (for example a dye in the visible or fluorescent to a UV / IR source), in particular any marker making it possible to distinguish the contaminated zones from the others (magnetic, isotopic marking , chemical etc.). The use of a suitable carrier allows standardization in the use of microorganisms on different matrices provide both better stability of microorganisms and avoids having to validate the stability of each control microorganism on each carrier after inoculation. It facilitates the implementation of the method according to the invention.
    In general, the control microorganisms with their support are added to the products to decontaminate in an appropriate amount to allow verification of the effectiveness of the decontamination process.
    The microorganisms and their support may, if necessary, undergo a prior treatment to decontamination, similar to that suffered by the product to be decontaminated, that is to say, which will mimic the known processes of product contamination. For example, in the case of natural products that are crushed (spices in particular) it is possible to grind them after adding the control microorganisms on their support to arrive at powders by recreating the conventional conditions of contamination of natural products.
    The control method according to the invention can be implemented before any implementation of a decontamination process on the product to be decontaminated, to validate the effectiveness of the decontamination process (validation process). It may also be used during the decontamination operations on the product to be decontaminated, as a decontamination control or as a compliance check for implementing the decontamination process (control method).
    The method according to the invention, whether it is a validation or control process can be implemented under the responsibility of the one who performs the decontamination or under that of a control body or homologation .
    The control microorganisms will advantageously be provided in the form of a kit, with their use medium, and, if appropriate, an instruction leaflet. The observation of the behavior of the control microorganism generally consists in controlling the presence of viable individuals, during the decontamination process and / or at its completion. The methods used are known to those skilled in the art: counting colonies on agar and / or molecular methods such as PCR and / or qRT-PCR, or detection tests for microorganisms such as immunoassays, for example tests using SPR technologies, such as those developed by PRESTODIAG, or phage detection tests.
    The present invention also relates to a control microorganism that can be used as a substitute in a method for controlling a decontamination process, chosen from Enterobacter hormaechei CNCM 1-5058, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM 1-5059, Enterobacter mori CNCM 1-5060, Pantoea calida CNCM I-5061, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5062, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5063, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM I-5054, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM I-5055, Pantoea calida CNCM I-5056, Pantoea gaviniae CNCM I-5057. It relates more particularly to these isolated microorganisms, or in the form of spores, vegetative form and / or dry vegetative form. The invention also relates to a mixture of microorganisms comprising at least 2 of the above species of microorganisms, in all their combinations 2 to 2, up to a mixture comprising the above species of microorganisms. The invention also relates to a composition comprising a microorganism above or a mixture of said microorganisms and a suitable carrier, in particular an inert carrier as defined above. The invention also relates to a control kit for a decontamination process, characterized in that it comprises at least one microorganism above and a suitable support as defined above for its use in the decontamination process, and where appropriate a instructions for use. The invention also relates to the use of at least one microorganism chosen from non-pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae of the genus Enterobacter, of the genus Erwinia or of the genus Pantoea as defined above, or a kit according to the invention, for the control of a decontamination process, in particular for prior validation or control during operation.
    DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
    Figures 1 to 4 show the resistance curves of different surrogate microorganisms compared to Salmonella and Cronobacter sakazakil pathogens.
    EXAMPLES
    Example I. Isolation and selection of microorganisms. 1. Isolation of Environmental Enterobacterlaceae 0.5 g of dry product sample was put into a 1.5 mL Eppendorf and heat-treated in a dry bath for 15 min at 95 ° C. After cooling to room temperature, 1 mL of concentrated PBS (aw = 0.950) was added before vortex mixing for 30 sec. Successive 10'® "dilutions were carried out in PBS (aw = 0.995) before spreading on a Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar agar (VRBG, biokar) at a rate of 100 μl per dish, after incubation at 37 ° C. for 24-48 h, colonies were isolated on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA, Sigma-Aldrich) agar plates and incubated again at 37 ° C for 24 h 2. Identification of Enterobacterlaceae Environmental
    Amplifications of 16S rDNA from each isolate were made directly by transplanting the colonies into the PCR mix. The primers used were: 27F (5'-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3 ') and 1492 R (5'-TAC GGH TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3'). To carry out the PCR reactions, the kit "Taq core kit" (Quiagen, France) was used. Briefly, the PCR mix (50 μL per reaction) for a colony is composed of 0.5 μl of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTP mix, 0.75 U Taq polymerase and 1 X buffer containing MgCl 2. The amplification was verified by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis before sequencing the PCR products by the Sanger method. The resulting sequences were blasted into the NCBI database (BLASTn) and thus the isolates could be identified. Twelve isolates were then selected. 3. Thermal Challenge a. Culture conditions of the strains
    All cultures were stored in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB, Sigma-Aldrich) with 20% glycerol (Sigma-Aldrich) at -80 ° C. For resumption of cultures, the bacteria were inoculated on TSA agar for 24 h at 37 ° C and then five colonies of each bacterium were subcultured in 50 mL of TSB before being incubated at 37 ° C for 8 h. These bacterial suspensions are then diluted in 50 ml of fresh TSB to reach an optical density (OD) of 0.01 at 600 nm. Stationary growth phase cultures are thus obtained after 20 hours at 37 ° C. b. Inoculation of the milk powder
    For each bacterium, the 50 ml of cultures are centrifuged (3400 g, 10 min at 25 ° C.) and then washed twice in 25 ml of PBS. Finally, a last centrifugation is performed, the supernatant is removed and the pellets are weighed. The milk powder (26% fat, Regilait, Saint-Martin-Belle-Roche, France) is added to each pellet with a ratio of 1:20 (mcuiot: mpoudre) and the whole is homogenized using a mortar. An inoculated milk powder is thus obtained. vs. Drying process
    For the inoculated milk powder, hermetic boxes, containing saturated solutions of salt to control the activity of the water and thus the relative humidity of the atmosphere, are used. Lithium chloride, potassium acetate, potassium carbonate and sodium bromide (all from Sigma-Aldrich) were used to obtain a water activity of 0.11, 0.25, 0.44 and 0.58. The atmospheres thus obtained are kept under convection using a fan (Sunon, Radiospare, France). For each strain, the inoculated powder is spread in petri dishes (about 5 g per dish). These boxes are then placed without a lid in airtight containers for 16 hours to reach equilibrium water activity. All the dryings were carried out at room temperature. d. Heat treatment 0.1 g of dried inoculated milk powder is placed in a 0.2 ml tube and treated at different temperatures (85 ° C, 90 ° C, 95 ° C and 100 ° C) for a given time (0 s, 30s, 60s, 90s, 120s, 150s and 180s) thanks to a thermal cycler (Bioer, France) before being cooled to 4 ° C. The samples are rehydrated by adding 1 mL of PBS before vortexing for 30 sec. A count of CFUs was performed after incubation on TSA for 24 h at 37 ° C. The results are expressed in log10 (N / No), where N represents the CFU after treatment and No represents the initial CFU of the milk powder before treatment (t = 0 s).
    Example II. Validation of a decontamination process.
    The most commonly used technology in the field of decontamination, both in the food and pharmaceutical industries, remains the autoclaves. It is thus possible to heat the product in a chamber, static or in motion, simply by condensation of steam on the latter. Drying of the product can then be done by a combination of heating and evacuation. There are hundreds of autoclave manufacturers around the world, a number of which are working on the pasteurization of dry food products.
    The classic cycle of pasteurization of this equipment consists of the following steps:
    Phase 1: Elimination of the air. Several cycles are performed to eliminate as much air as possible. This step is necessary to allow the steam to penetrate through the product.
    Phase 2: Heating. The steam is injected in order to heat the product. The enclosure of the chamber is also heated by electric resistances to avoid any phenomenon of condensation.
    Phase 3: Pasteurization. Once the product has reached a target temperature, there is a maintenance step at this temperature. The time-temperature treatment pair is defined before the validation work. The time-temperature pair is crucial for the effectiveness of the treatment.
    Phase 4: Drying. The steam is evacuated by vacuum drying.
    Phase 5: Aeration. The chamber is ventilated by a stream of filtered air at atmospheric pressure
    The product is then removed from the chamber in the direction of production, it can not cross the untreated material. Depending on the cycle chosen, its end-of-process temperature varies from 30 to 50 ° C. The product is not conditioned until it has returned to room temperature because any bagging that is too hot could cause sprouting.
    Validation of an in-situ decontamination process generally involves three main steps:
    Preparatory phase: evaluation of the process, risk assessment, qualification of the model germ, development of the in-situ validation protocol
    Execution phase: Inoculation of the product to be tested, execution of validation "batches", recovery of samples
    Synthesis phase: enumeration of model germs, writing of the analysis report and / or validation report
    When developing the validation protocol are defined, inter alia:
    The need or not to carry out a pre-treatment of the product to be tested (for example: irradiation)
    The number of validation lots and the duration of each validation batch to be carried out
    The amount of product to be inoculated (from 25g to> 10t depending on the decontamination processes and the selected validation method)
    The desired level of inoculation and the amount of model germ to use The method of inoculation of the product with the model germ (different possibilities exist, including inoculation in the laboratory, directly in the factory, at a service provider ... )
    The sampling method at the output of the production line (including among others the number and the size of the samples)
    The method of enumeration of the model germ (among others: selective medium or not) The answers to these different questions depend essentially on three parameters: type of process to validate, target pathogen, product to be inoculated.
    Thus, the validation "kit" provided can vary in particular by:
    Level of mixture of the model germ with the product to be tested (the model germ can be supplied in concentrated form to be inoculated or in pre-mixed form with the product)
    Level of concentration in model germ
    Quantity supplied (from several kgs / tens of kgs for the concentrated form to several tons for the premixed version)
    REFERENCES
    Fudge, James, Dunn, Michael, Pike, Oscar, Richard, Robison, Steele, Frost, The Isolation and Identification of Pantoea dispersed in a non-pathogenic Surrogate for Salmonella Typhimurium Phage Type 42 in Flour, International Journal of Food Microbiology (2004). 2015), doi: 10.1016 / j.ijfoodmicro.2015.11.012 SE Niebuhr, A. Laury, GR Acuff, and JS Dickson. Evaluation of non-pathogenic surrogate bacteria for the treatment of Salmonella enteric for selected antimicrobial treatments, cold storage and fermentation in meat.
    Niebuhr SE, Laury A, Acuff GR, Dickson JS. Of Salmonella enterica for selected antimicrobial treatments, cold storage, and fermentation in meat. J Food Prot. 2008 Apr; 71 (4): 714-8.
    Joshua B. Gurtier, Rebecca B. Rivera, Howard Q. Zhang, David J. Geveke. Selection of surrogate bacteria in place of E. coli 0157: H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium for pulsed electric field treatment of orange juice. International Journal of Food Microbiology 139 (2010) 1-8.
    Andreia Bianchini, Jayne Stratton, Steve Weier, Timothy Hartter, Brian Plattner, Galen Rokey, Gerry Hertzel, Lakshmi Gompa, Bis Marck Martinez and Kent M. Eskridge. Use of Enterococcus faecium as a Surrogate for Salmonella Enterica during Extrusion of a Balanced Carbohydrate-Protein Meal. J. Food Prot., Vol. 77, No. 1 - ERDOGAN CEYLAN AND DERRICK A. BAUTISTA. Evaluating Pediococcus acidilactici and Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as Thermal Surrogate Microorganisms for Salmonella for In-Plant Validation Studies of Low-Moisture Pet Food Products. Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 78, No. 5, 2015, Pages 934-939. Guidelines for Using Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as a Surrogate Microorganism in Almond Process Validation. Almond Board of California Guideline. Safety of the Surrogate Microorganism Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 for Use in Thermal Process Validation. Lauren M. Kopit, Eun Bae Kim, Roland J. Siezen, Linda J. Harris, Maria L. Marco. Appl. About. Microbiol. 2014, 80 (6): 1899. DOLIO.1128 / AEM.03859-13. - Elena Enache, Ai Kataoka, D. Glenn Black, Caria D. Napier, Richard Podolak, and Melinda M. Hayman. Development of a Dry Inoculation Method for Thermal Challenge Studies in Low-Moisture Foods by Using Talc as Carrier for Salmonella and Surrogate (Enterococcus faecium). Journal of Food Protection, 2015. 78: 1106-1112
    权利要求:
    Claims (14)
    [1" id="c-fr-0001]
    1. A method for controlling a decontamination process in which the decontamination process is carried out in the presence of at least one control microorganism and the behavior of said at least one control microorganism is observed during said decontamination process, characterized in that the at least one control microorganism is selected from non-pathogenic Enterobactenaceae of the genus Enterobacter or genus Erwinia and mixtures thereof.
    [2" id="c-fr-0002]
    2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that a mixture of at least 2 control microorganisms is used.
    [3" id="c-fr-0003]
    3. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that the mixture of control organisms comprises at least 2 control microorganisms selected from Enterobactenaceae non-pathogenic Enterobacter or genus Erwinia and mixtures thereof.
    [4" id="c-fr-0004]
    4. Control method according to one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the control microorganisms selected from non-pathogenic Enterobactenaceae are selected from Enterobacter hormaechei CNCM I-5058, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM I-5059, Enterobacter mori CNCM I- 5060, Pantoea calida CNCM 1-5061, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5062, Erwinia persicina CNCM I-5063 and mixtures thereof.
    [5" id="c-fr-0005]
    5. Control method according to one of claims 2 to 4, characterized in that the mixture of at least 2 control microorganisms comprises at least one control microorganism selected from Enterobactenaceae nonpathogenic Enterobacter or genus Erwinia and at least a control microorganism selected from non-pathogenic Enterobactenaceae of the genus Pantoea.
    [6" id="c-fr-0006]
    6. Control method according to claim 5, characterized in that the at least one control microorganism selected from non-pathogenic Enterobactenaceae of the genus Pantoea is selected from Pantoea agglomerans CNCM I-5054, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM I-5055, Pantoea calida CNCM I -5056, Pantoea gaviniae CNCM I-5057 and mixtures thereof.
    [7" id="c-fr-0007]
    7. Method according to one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the control microorganisms are employed in the form of spores and / or dry vegetative form.
    [8" id="c-fr-0008]
    8. Method according to one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the control microorganisms are used dry on an inert support.
    [9" id="c-fr-0009]
    9. Method according to one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the decontamination process comprises one or more steps of pasteurization, drying, extrusion, roasting, baking, sterilization, autoclaving and steaming.
    [10" id="c-fr-0010]
    10. The method of control according to one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the controlled decontamination process has for object the elimination of one or more target pathogenic microorganisms, selected from Salmonella, Eschenchia coll, Bacillus, Listeria, Campylobacter, Cronobacter sakazakn.
    [11" id="c-fr-0011]
    11. Control microorganisms that can be used as substitutes in a control method of a decontamination process, characterized in that they are chosen from Enterobacter hormechechel CNCM 1-5058, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM 1-5059, Enterobacter mori CNCM 1 -5060, Pantoea callda CNCM 1-5061, Erwinla persicina CNCM 1-5062, Erwinla persicina CNCM 1-5063, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM 1-5054, Pantoea agglomerans CNCM 1-5055, Pantoea callda CNCM 1-5056, Pantoea gavinlae CNCM 1- 5057.
    [12" id="c-fr-0012]
    12. Mixture of control microorganisms, characterized in that it comprises at least 2 species of microorganisms according to claim 11.
    [13" id="c-fr-0013]
    13. Control kit of a decontamination process, characterized in that it comprises at least one microorganism according to claim 11 and a suitable carrier for use in the decontamination process.
    [14" id="c-fr-0014]
    14. Use of at least one microorganism according to claim 11 or a mixture according to claim 12 or a control kit according to claim 13 for the control of a decontamination process.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    EP3449007B1|2021-04-07|New decontamination surrogate microorganisms
    Stoops et al.2016|Microbial community assessment of mealworm larvae | and grasshoppers | sold for human consumption
    Alvarez-Ordóñez et al.2019|Biofilms in food processing environments: challenges and opportunities
    Bevilacqua et al.2010|Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Italian Bella di Cerignola table olives: selection of potential multifunctional starter cultures
    Komitopoulou et al.2009|Fate of Salmonella in dry confectionery raw materials
    Saraoui et al.2016|Lactococcus piscium: a psychrotrophic lactic acid bacterium with bioprotective or spoilage activity in food—a review
    Vasilopoulos et al.2010|Technology-induced selection towards the spoilage microbiota of artisan-type cooked ham packed under modified atmosphere
    Lo Verso et al.2018|Isolation and selection of potential probiotic bacteria from the pig gastrointestinal tract
    Zago et al.2009|Detection and quantification of Enterococcus gilvus in cheese by real-time PCR
    Jaouani et al.2014|High inhibition of P aenibacillus larvae and L isteria monocytogenes by E nterococcus isolated from different sources in T unisia and identification of their bacteriocin genes
    Zeng et al.2016|Characterization of the Microbial Flora from S uan Yu, a C hinese Traditional Low‐Salt Fermented Fish
    Del Árbol et al.2016|Changes in microbial diversity of brined green asparagus upon treatment with high hydrostatic pressure
    Schrama et al.2013|Adaptation of L isteria monocytogenes in a simulated cheese medium: effects on virulence using the G alleria mellonella infection model
    Paramithiotis et al.2010|Fermentation: microbiology and biochemistry
    Abdel-Mohsein et al.2010|Isolation of bacteriocin-like substances producing bacteria from finished cattle-manure compost and activity evaluation against some food-borne pathogenic and spoilage bacteria
    ABDEL‐MOHSEIN et al.2011|Characterization and partial purification of a bacteriocin‐like substance produced by thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis H1 isolated from cow manure compost
    Ly et al.2020|Survival and virulence of listeria monocytogenes during storage on chocolate liquor, corn flakes, and dry-roasted shelled pistachios at 4 and 23 C
    Silvetti et al.2014|Biopreservation potential of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from Italian traditional raw milk cheeses
    Schirmer et al.2014|Use of used vs. fresh cheese brines and the effect of pH and salt concentration on the survival of Listeria monocytogenes
    Baker et al.2020|Survival of Escherichia coli O157 in autoclaved and natural sandy soil mesocosms
    El‐Ghaish et al.2017|Antimicrobial impact for Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis A15 and Enterococcus faecium A15 isolated from some traditional Egyptian dairy products on some pathogenic bacteria
    Khalid et al.2015|Prevalence, antibiogram, and cdt genes of toxigenic Campylobacter jejuni in salad style vegetables | at farms and retail outlets in Terengganu
    Tasaku et al.2017|Inhibitory activity of food-originated Pediococcus pentosaceus NP6 against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in Nile Tilapia By-products
    Gouws et al.2014|The influence of processing on the microbial risk associated with Rooibos | tea
    Lauková et al.2011|Bacteriocinogenic activity of Enterococcus faecalis strains from chouriço, traditional sausage produced in Southern Portugal
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    DK3449007T3|2021-06-14|
    CA3020309A1|2017-11-02|
    EP3449007A1|2019-03-06|
    FR3050738B1|2021-07-23|
    ES2875768T3|2021-11-11|
    WO2017186907A1|2017-11-02|
    US10975414B2|2021-04-13|
    US20190153504A1|2019-05-23|
    EP3449007B1|2021-04-07|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    WO2002090904A2|2001-05-03|2002-11-14|The Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona|Uv sensitive bacillus subtilis spores and biodosimetry applications|
    FR3082852A1|2018-06-26|2019-12-27|Novolyze|COMPOSITION OF DECONTAMINATION INDICATOR MICROORGANISMS|
    FR3085963A1|2018-09-19|2020-03-20|Novolyze|DRY COMPOSITION OF MODEL MICROORGANISMS|
    WO2020263788A1|2019-06-24|2020-12-30|Regents Of The University Of Minnesota|Surrogate virus assays and methods|
    WO2021016207A1|2019-07-19|2021-01-28|Fremonta Corporation|Method for assessing the lethality and the level of cross contamination control of a process non-invasively|
    法律状态:
    2017-04-11| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 2 |
    2017-11-03| PLSC| Publication of the preliminary search report|Effective date: 20171103 |
    2018-03-20| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 3 |
    2019-04-29| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 4 |
    2020-04-30| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 5 |
    2021-04-29| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 6 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    FR1653914A|FR3050738B1|2016-04-29|2016-04-29|DECONTAMINATION WITNESS MICROORGANISMS|FR1653914A| FR3050738B1|2016-04-29|2016-04-29|DECONTAMINATION WITNESS MICROORGANISMS|
    ES17724501T| ES2875768T3|2016-04-29|2017-04-28|New microorganisms that indicate decontamination|
    US16/091,733| US10975414B2|2016-04-29|2017-04-28|Decontamination surrogate microorganisms|
    CA3020309A| CA3020309A1|2016-04-29|2017-04-28|Nouveaux microorganismes temoins de decontamination|
    DK17724501.6T| DK3449007T3|2016-04-29|2017-04-28|NEW DECONTAMINATION SURROGATE MICROORGANISMS|
    EP17724501.6A| EP3449007B1|2016-04-29|2017-04-28|New decontamination surrogate microorganisms|
    PCT/EP2017/060186| WO2017186907A1|2016-04-29|2017-04-28|New decontamination surrogate microorganisms|
    [返回顶部]